Post by arfanho7 on Feb 23, 2024 23:35:08 GMT -8
“I could watch a colleague challenge a student and I could think that’s the way I should teach but what I miss is the backstory about why he is doing it in that particular case.” Perhaps even more crucial those systems assume that the person undertaking the learning wants to duplicate exactly what the other person is doing—despite the fact that they may be perpetuating mistakes made by a predecessor or simply following procedures that may be a bad fit for a person of a different personality and skillset.
New research suggests the best way to transfer knowledge in corporate roles is to improve upon traditional vicarious learning models.©iStock cacaroot Instead Myers envisions a model of coactive vicarious learning. “The major shift theoretically is moving from a language of transfer of taking fully formed knowledge and passing it from one person’s head to another Egypt WhatsApp Number List and instead talking about co creation and building it together ” he says. “What that means practically is vicarious learning must be more interactive. Both the learner and the sharer of knowledge bring things to the table and together create something new.” on his own experience as an outdoor wilderness instructor an area in which the cost of failure is too high for people to learn only from their own experience.
“Trial and error is not the way you want to learn rock climbing ” says Myers. When acquiring knowledge is life or death In his own research he has spent hundreds of hours studying a similarly fraught industry—high risk medical transport teams—to learn how they acquire knowledge that can literally mean the difference between life and death. He found that much of their vicarious learning occurred not through studying procedural manuals but through informal storytelling in the downtime between missions in which team members related past incidents.
New research suggests the best way to transfer knowledge in corporate roles is to improve upon traditional vicarious learning models.©iStock cacaroot Instead Myers envisions a model of coactive vicarious learning. “The major shift theoretically is moving from a language of transfer of taking fully formed knowledge and passing it from one person’s head to another Egypt WhatsApp Number List and instead talking about co creation and building it together ” he says. “What that means practically is vicarious learning must be more interactive. Both the learner and the sharer of knowledge bring things to the table and together create something new.” on his own experience as an outdoor wilderness instructor an area in which the cost of failure is too high for people to learn only from their own experience.
“Trial and error is not the way you want to learn rock climbing ” says Myers. When acquiring knowledge is life or death In his own research he has spent hundreds of hours studying a similarly fraught industry—high risk medical transport teams—to learn how they acquire knowledge that can literally mean the difference between life and death. He found that much of their vicarious learning occurred not through studying procedural manuals but through informal storytelling in the downtime between missions in which team members related past incidents.
